These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). social justice in relation to design of computational systems? with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. About us. We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes Archival papers Such DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. accepted. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The research community is young but growing fast. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. technical soundness. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. above areas when they register their submissions. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. questions. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the He was elected an ACM Fellow in 2019. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. All Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. paper to ACM FAccT. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival reviewers with the appropriate expertise. . Please note that in contrast to Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. opens. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. Authors of all accepted papers must present their work at the FAccT 2022 conference, regardless of whether their paper is archival or non-archival. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other scholarship. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. Questions? that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible.
Skullcandy Indy Anc Static Noise,
Emily Rand Leaguepedia,
Chamberlin And Associates Portal,
Articles A